Xavi/Iniesta better than Zidane?

Discussion in 'The Beautiful Game' started by lessthanjake, Jun 19, 2015.

  1. lessthanjake

    lessthanjake Member+

    May 9, 2015
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Yeah, that game is definitely not representative though, to be fair. But, in general, Xavi’s 2004-2005 season is sorely underrated—he was absolutely world-class that year. Which is, for instance, why he won La Liga Spanish Player of the Year and made multiple ESM teams of the month.
     
  2. Isaías Silva Serafim

    Real Madrid
    Brazil
    Dec 2, 2021
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    PDG just posted a link of this post from 2012 and I think it's worth to post here (if weren't posted already)

    Just to update the numbers from Messi and Ronaldo:

    C. Ronaldo 41 assists, 183 games (0.224)
    L. Messi 40 assists, 163 games (0.245)
     
    PDG1978 repped this.
  3. PDG1978

    PDG1978 Member+

    Mar 8, 2009
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC
    Yeah, another place I made some posts on the topic was here (you saw already Isaias though because I spotted a rep from you on one of the posts again just now!) - data according to the particular sources involved in compiling it, such as in this post
    https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/top-5-individual-performance-in-cl-history.2124240/#post-41111178

    For sure on a per game basis Zidane fares very well for CL assists (less so in league games overall to be fair, as has been discussed before I know).
     
    Isaías Silva Serafim repped this.
  4. PDG1978

    PDG1978 Member+

    Mar 8, 2009
    Club:
    Nottingham Forest FC
    Also it was your thread to be fair (I'd forgotten that)!

    But yeah Puck's listing was pretty much correct according to OPTA-standards I believe (maybe one or two cases where an assist can or can't be given could mean small differences IIRC....).
     
    Isaías Silva Serafim repped this.
  5. Sexy Beast

    Sexy Beast Member+

    Dinamo Zagreb
    Croatia
    Aug 11, 2016
    Zagreb
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Croatia
    I think a good question is are there more assisted goals in todays football than other periods of time and regardless, what the profile of assists look like (I assume more assists came from crosses in the past).
     
  6. Isaías Silva Serafim

    Real Madrid
    Brazil
    Dec 2, 2021
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    I had even forgotten about this thread lol. I think I'll repost Carlito's post about the best campaigns of CL finalists on Sofascore in this thread
     
  7. Claudius111

    Claudius111 New Member

    Liverpool FC
    Argentina
    Jul 28, 2023
  8. Claudius111

    Claudius111 New Member

    Liverpool FC
    Argentina
    Jul 28, 2023
    Every Xavi CL knockout game from 2007/08 to 2010/11 (4 seasons).
     
    lessthanjake repped this.
  9. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
     
  10. Claudius111

    Claudius111 New Member

    Liverpool FC
    Argentina
    Jul 28, 2023
    Xavi WC match rating (starts) from 02-10:

    8.7, 8.4, 8.3, 8.2, 8.2, 8.1, 8.0, 7.2, 7.2, 7.1, 7.1.
     
  11. Claudius111

    Claudius111 New Member

    Liverpool FC
    Argentina
    Jul 28, 2023
  12. Isaías Silva Serafim

    Real Madrid
    Brazil
    Dec 2, 2021
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil


     
  13. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
     
  14. ffff15

    ffff15 Member

    Argentina
    Sep 29, 2021
    Fake stats for Platini, he created 3 big chances against Portugal alone
     
  15. Isaías Silva Serafim

    Real Madrid
    Brazil
    Dec 2, 2021
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
     
    SayWhatIWant and Buyo repped this.
  16. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
    According to Sofascore?
     
  17. ffff15

    ffff15 Member

    Argentina
    Sep 29, 2021
    Sofascore made a mistake, the didn't count BCC stats for french player against Portugal
    It's not a valid source, I've seen a lot of mistakes from them.
     
  18. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
    Sofascore is using Opta's dataset. Glad we got this out of the way
     
  19. ffff15

    ffff15 Member

    Argentina
    Sep 29, 2021
    Just watch that france- portugal game in 1984 Euro and tell me how many big chances Platini created and dont be a fool like this, yeah they used opta but they made mistake on big chances stats in some of the games and didnt count it like france- portugal 1984 ( just take a look at all of the french players stats) somehow they did for portugal players
     
  20. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
    I agree there's error which is why these stats are not gospel. But if you're gonna reject these, we should put an asterisk for all.
     
  21. lessthanjake

    lessthanjake Member+

    May 9, 2015
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Sofascore has Zidane at 5 big chances created in Euro 2000, not 6. And most of those big chances created were in one group stage match against an abysmal Denmark team. Meanwhile, all of Xavi’s big chances created in Euro 2012 were against Italy. So there’s definitely some important context here.

    As for the discussion between SayWhatIWant and ffff15 regarding Platini, I think we should generally recognize that “big chances created” is a very squishy stat. There’s a definition for it, but it’s inherently subjective in its application. I’d previously thought that it had a mechanical definition that was tied to the xG of the chance, but it was pointed out to me a while back (I think by SayWhatIWant, so credit to him on this) that I was wrong about that. That doesn’t make it useless, but it’d definitely go towards explaining why one might watch a match and totally disagree with the assessment of how many “big chances” there were. I don’t think that makes it useless as a stat, but it’s something to keep in mind, and is especially something to keep in mind when we’re looking at small samples of data like this (since differences of subjective opinion in what should and shouldn’t count can easily make a huge difference in small samples). I think the fact that it’s a stat with a strong subjective element is clearly a good reason not take the “big chances created” stat as an absolute objective measure, but rather more as a general guide (and, as a sidenote, it’s definitely a reason not to cross-pollinate one person or group’s “big chances created” measurements with another’s, because they’ll probably just be measuring different things).

    One query I have for people on this (that is not particularly related to the players that are the subject of this thread) is whether we know if “big chances created” functions more like Expected Assisted Goals or Expected Assists, in terms of whether it counts situations where there’s a good opportunity but a shot never actually happens, or whether it only looks at the quality of the chance at the point at which a shot occurs. The definitions I can find for “big chance created” are kind of ambiguous on this. I tend to think a stat is better if it operates like Expected Assists (i.e. if it’s is based on the chance of a goal when the recipient receives the ball, rather than looking at the chance of a goal when a recipient shoots it), and I can’t quite figure out how “big chances created” functions in this regard. I think it works the way I think is better, but I can’t figure it out for sure. Does anyone know?
     
  22. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015
     
  23. lessthanjake

    lessthanjake Member+

    May 9, 2015
    Club:
    FC Barcelona
    Those are not compiled by OPTA (but rather, as far as I can tell, by a random anonymous person on Twitter), and as I said, comparing tallies of two different people/groups on an inherently subjective stat is not really worth anything.
     
  24. SayWhatIWant

    SayWhatIWant Member+

    Jan 10, 2015

Share This Page